Often synonymous with “difficult customers”, they’re THE customer care nightmare: unhappy customers can be hard to please.
Strong emotions may be at play. In British and some other cultures, those are usually well guarded, making it tricky for advisors to correctly read the customer’s emotional state.
No wonder many customer care folks learn to approach complaints with a guiding structure.
But here’s the thing:
This article shows why — and introduces you to a scientifically proven way to connect with people who are stressed, emotional and making a complaint.
Any quick Google search brings up a multitude of service-related acronyms designed to structure your complaint handling.
Acronyms are a “common mnemonic for remembering lists“, often in the right order. They’re easy to teach and remember and give customer care teams the reassuring feeling that “they’ve got this covered”.
Their usefulness ends there.
Teach someone an acronym, and they’re likely to interpret it as step-by-step instructions. For example, they’ll listen first, then empathise, then apologise and then react (LEARN). And — why would you find a way forward before you empathise (ANSWER)?
A good conversation partner is always listening and empathizing — even after the conversation has ended, to empathetically improve company processes and policies. If advisors misunderstand your chosen acronym as a list of steps they should follow, your customers’ experience will suffer.
Robert Bacal’s CARP model starts off by telling advisors to assert their “control” of the situation. In the 21st century, that’s an inaccurate view of the situation.
When a customer decides to complain, they’re in control. The customer can decide to shout or ask to speak to a supervisor, they can decide to never buy from your company again, and it’s up to them whether the Ombudsman or a hungry social media audience hear about their case. Just look at what happened when United Airlines were trying to assert their control after Mr Dao’s famous complaint.
What is more, the very word “control” is aggressive and the opposite of non-violent communication. You don’t want your support team to behave like the now-suspended American Airlines flight attendant, or barge in right at the start of a complaint and shout “I’VE GOT THIS, SIR!” at your customer.
Controlling the situation is the happy result of a respectful, non-violent exchange about the customer’s needs and how to meet them.
While Robert Bacal would probably agree, this isn’t obvious from the word “control” — and customer care teams don’t always get to refer to the book that came with the 4-step model they learned.
Like “control”, “neutralise” (in the ANSWER model) is another word that should come with a manual.
“But this doesn’t work. In fact, it usually only infuriates an upset person even more” (emphasis ours).
Fortunately, she goes on to teach a simple technique for dealing with difficult people, based on Dr Mark Goulston’s hostage release technique.
N-U-T stands for 3 easy-to-apply, scientifically proven steps:
Customer: I used the gift card I ordered for Christmas to order a jacket from you, and you sent it in the wrong size. I’ve been told I need to send this off for a refund BUT I want this exchanged FOR FREE as it was YOUR MISTAKE! I would like to open a complain here please
Advisor: When returning an item from an order that has been part paid using a gift card, you will primarily be refunded in the form of a gift card. If you are returning part of your order that exceeds the value of the gift card used, any remaining balance will then be refunded onto your payment card.
Customer: Yes, the reason that I had to return it was because it was a wrong size! It wasn’t because I changed my mind!
As Vanessa Van Edwards puts it:
“Do NOT try to move onto the Transform step until you are fully done naming and understanding. If someone is still speaking in a loud voice, tearful or flushed with emotion — they are not done processing yet.”
“When you Name, Understand, and Transform someone out of their difficulty, you become their ally.”— Vanessa Van Edwards, Captivate
— And who wouldn’t want that?